Contempt Charges Loom Over BJP’s Nishikant Dubey, Agnimitra Paul for Criticizing Judiciary: AG’s Consent Sought

New Delhi, April 21 – A political-legal storm is brewing as BJP MP Nishikant Dubey and West Bengal MLA Agnimitra Paul come under the scanner for their controversial comments targeting the Supreme Court. The matter escalated after advocate ABrijesh Singh formally wrote to Attorney General R Venkataramani, seeking his consent to initiate criminal contempt of court proceedings against both leaders under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

Accusations of Scandalous Remarks and Attacks on Judiciary

In his strongly worded letter, Singh alleged that the duo made “scandalous, false, and derogatory statements” in public forums and media, aimed directly at the Supreme Court of India. “These statements not only undermine the authority of the judiciary but also shake the common man’s deep-rooted faith in the system,” the letter stated.

Singh emphasized that both individuals hold constitutional offices—Dubey as a Member of Parliament from Jharkhand, and Paul as a sitting legislator in the West Bengal Assembly. “It is highly condemnable that lawmakers are publicly attacking the judiciary with such disregard,” he added.

What Did Nishikant Dubey Say?

The controversy stems from Dubey’s recent remarks in which he accused the Supreme Court of overstepping its boundaries and interfering with the legislative process. He questioned, “Why do we need Parliament if the Supreme Court is going to make all the laws?” He further went on to blame Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna for allegedly causing “religious wars” in India—a comment that drew sharp criticism from legal and political circles alike.

Agnimitra Paul Echoes Dubey’s Views

Adding fuel to the fire, Agnimitra Paul backed Dubey’s stance, stating, “He has said the right thing. The President appoints the Chief Justice of India, so how can the Chief Justice deny the President’s order?” Her endorsement of Dubey’s comments has also placed her in the crosshairs of potential contempt proceedings.

“Super Parliament” Row: Jagdeep Dhankhar Also Draws Flak

This controversy follows close on the heels of another judicial standoff involving Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar, who recently criticized the judiciary for acting like a “super Parliament.” His remarks, suggesting that the apex court had no authority to set timelines for the President, further inflamed tensions between constitutional institutions.

Legal experts have condemned Dhankhar’s and Dubey’s comments, labeling them as unprecedented attacks on judicial independence in a democratic setup.

Will AG Grant Consent for Contempt?

As per Indian law, prior consent of the Attorney General is mandatory to initiate contempt of court proceedings in matters affecting the Supreme Court. All eyes are now on AG R Venkataramani, whose decision could have significant legal and political ramifications.

If the consent is granted, Dubey and Paul could face criminal contempt charges, which carry serious penalties including fines and imprisonment.

Opposition Slams BJP Leaders, Demands Accountability

Opposition parties have seized the opportunity to slam the BJP leadership, accusing them of attempting to intimidate the judiciary. Several leaders called for strict legal action against those who disrespect constitutional institutions.

Final

With the nation’s eyes fixed on the Attorney General’s office, the case marks a crucial moment in the ongoing tension between the legislature and judiciary. Whether this results in actual legal proceedings or not, it has already sparked a larger conversation on the limits of free speech, especially when it comes from public representatives.