Hapur DSO Seema Chaudhary Among Five Booked in Fraud and Forgery Case Filed by Mother

• WhatsApp
• YouTube
• X
• Instagram

A family dispute involving property ownership has taken a serious legal turn in Uttar Pradesh after a criminal case was registered against Hapur DSO Seema Chaudhary and four others following allegations made by her own mother of fraud, forgery and criminal intimidation.

The case, which has attracted considerable attention because it involves a serving government officer, was registered at Sarasawa police station after Munesh Rani, a resident of Mirpur Sitapur village, accused five individuals of conspiring to take control of her land through fabricated documents and forged signatures.

According to the complaint, Munesh Rani alleged that her daughter Seema Chaudhary, along with Sanjeev Kumar Chaudhary, Rajendra Rana, Gambhir and Naresh Kumar, worked together to create circumstances that would enable them to gain possession of her property. The complainant claimed that financial transactions linked to her bank account took place without her knowledge and consent, raising questions about how the account was being operated.

One of the most serious allegations in the FIR relates to a sum of ₹15 lakh that was reportedly deposited into Munesh Rani’s bank account without her prior knowledge. She further alleged that transactions and operations involving the account continued without her authorization, leading her to suspect a larger attempt to establish a financial trail connected to the disputed land.

The complaint also refers to a receipt allegedly dated September 16, 2023, which Munesh Rani described as fraudulent. According to her allegations, the document was prepared using forged signatures in an effort to create a legal basis for transferring or claiming ownership rights over the property. She stated that an examination of the signatures later indicated that they did not belong to her, strengthening her claim that the documents had been fabricated.

Property disputes involving allegations of forged signatures and manipulated documents are not uncommon in Uttar Pradesh and often evolve into lengthy legal battles involving both civil and criminal proceedings. However, cases involving close family members and government officials tend to draw greater public scrutiny because of concerns regarding influence, access to official systems and the possibility of misuse of authority.

Munesh Rani further alleged that she faced threats when she objected to the alleged activities and attempted to challenge the transactions and documents linked to her land. She claimed that she was warned of serious consequences if she continued to oppose the actions of the accused.

Acting on the complaint, police registered a case under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, which deal with cheating, forgery of valuable security, forgery for the purpose of cheating, using forged documents as genuine and criminal intimidation respectively.

Police officials said that an investigation is currently underway and emphasized that the allegations mentioned in the FIR represent the complainant’s version of events. Investigators are expected to examine banking records, property-related documents and the disputed signatures as part of the inquiry.

Authorities have maintained that the facts of the case will become clear only after a detailed investigation and verification of the evidence. Until then, the allegations remain subject to scrutiny and legal examination as investigators work to establish whether any criminal wrongdoing took place in connection with the disputed property.