Delhi HC Slams Ramdev’s ‘Sharbat Jihad’ Remark on Rooh Afza, Says It Shocks Court’s Conscience

Delhi, India — April 22, 2025: In a development that has stirred both legal and social circles, the Delhi High Court on Tuesday strongly criticized Yoga guru Baba Ramdev over his controversial “sharbat jihad” remark allegedly targeting Hamdard’s popular beverage Rooh Afza. Justice Amit Bansal observed that the comment “shocks the conscience of the court” and is “indefensible.”

The sharp rebuke came during the hearing of a plea filed by Hamdard National Foundation (India) against Patanjali Foods Ltd., accusing the company and its co-founder Baba Ramdev of making baseless, communal, and damaging remarks while promoting their own product — Patanjali Gulab Sharbat.

What Sparked the Controversy?

The row began when Ramdev, while endorsing Patanjali’s rose-flavored sharbat, allegedly claimed that revenue from Hamdard’s Rooh Afza was being used to fund madrasas and mosques. The comment was widely circulated and quickly drew backlash for its communal undertones. Ramdev later defended himself, stating he had neither named a specific brand nor targeted any community.

Court’s Reaction: “Indefensible and Shocking”

Justice Bansal made it clear that such remarks were beyond acceptable limits, stating:

“It shocks the conscience of the court. It is indefensible. Take instructions from your client, otherwise there will be a strong order.”

The judge’s statement reflects the gravity with which the judiciary is treating the matter, especially in light of the sensitive communal context involved.

Hamdard’s Legal Stand

Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing Hamdard, argued that the case goes beyond mere product disparagement.

“This is not just about business rivalry or false advertising. This is hate speech. He calls it sharbat jihad. Why should he drag us into this when we’re running a respected business?” Rohatgi said.

He further added that such statements contribute to communal polarization and could damage the brand’s century-old reputation built on trust and quality.

Patanjali’s Counsel Absent, Matter Adjourned

Interestingly, the counsel for Ramdev and Patanjali was not present during the scheduled hearing, leading the court to postpone the matter. The judge stated that the issue would be taken up again shortly and warned that strong judicial action could follow if satisfactory clarifications were not provided.

Background on Rooh Afza and Hamdard

Rooh Afza, a legacy product launched in 1907, is a household name in India and abroad. Made with herbs, fruits, and rose extracts, it holds a special place during the summer season and festive occasions like Ramadan. Hamdard, a charitable organization, has maintained a reputation for healthcare and social welfare through its herbal products.

What’s Next?

The Delhi High Court is expected to revisit the case soon. With tensions rising and media attention growing, all eyes will be on what steps the judiciary will take next.