Social activist Snehamayi Krishna has been arrested by the Central Crime Branch in connection with an alleged fake document and fabricated audio clip case involving a senior Karnataka Administrative Service officer. The arrest follows a cybercrime investigation that began earlier this month.
The complaint was filed by D B Natesh, a senior KAS officer and former Commissioner of the Mysuru Urban Development Authority. He alleged that manipulated documents and a fabricated audio clip were circulated on social media with the intent to damage his reputation.
Based on the complaint, a case was registered on February 18 at the Bengaluru City Cyber Crime Police Station. Investigators stated that the accused allegedly created forged documents and an audio recording using the complainant’s photograph. The material was uploaded on Facebook and allegedly used to run a defamatory campaign targeting the officer.
Police officials examined digital evidence collected from social media platforms. The controversial audio clip underwent detailed scrutiny as part of the ongoing investigation. Authorities said they followed due legal procedure before taking further action.
Krishna, a resident of Mysuru, was taken into custody by the Central Crime Branch Bengaluru. Officials obtained a court-issued search warrant before conducting a search at his residence. During the operation, police seized documents and electronic materials believed to be linked to the case.
Earlier, a notice had been issued asking Krishna to appear before investigators. He was later secured and is currently being questioned in connection with the allegations.
A statement from the office of Seemant Kumar Singh, Commissioner of Police, Bengaluru, confirmed that investigators collected evidence from both the complainant and online platforms. Authorities emphasized that the investigation remains ongoing and that further action will depend on forensic findings and legal review.
The case highlights increasing concerns about the misuse of social media to circulate misleading or defamatory content. Cybercrime authorities have repeatedly warned against fabricating digital material, especially when it targets public officials. Legal experts note that if the allegations are proven, the accused could face serious charges under laws related to forgery, defamation, and cybercrime.
Key highlights: Snehamayi Krishna arrested by Bengaluru Central Crime Branch; complaint filed by senior KAS officer D B Natesh; alleged fake documents and fabricated audio clip uploaded on social media; court-approved search conducted; investigation continues.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q1. Who is Snehamayi Krishna?
Snehamayi Krishna is a social activist from Mysuru who was recently arrested in connection with an alleged fake document and fabricated audio clip case involving a senior government officer.
Q2. Why was Snehamayi Krishna arrested?
He was arrested for allegedly creating fake documents and uploading a fabricated audio clip on social media to defame senior KAS officer D B Natesh.
Q3. Who filed the complaint in this case?
The complaint was filed by D B Natesh, a senior Karnataka Administrative Service (KAS) officer and former Commissioner of the Mysuru Urban Development Authority (MUDA).
Q4. Which police unit is investigating the case?
The case was registered at the Bengaluru City Cyber Crime Police Station, and the arrest was carried out by the Central Crime Branch Bengaluru.
Q5. When was the case registered?
Police registered the case on February 18 following the complaint lodged by the KAS officer.
Q6. What evidence has police collected so far?
Investigators collected digital evidence from social media platforms, examined the uploaded audio clip, and seized relevant documents and electronic materials during a court-approved search at the accused’s residence.
Q7. What legal action could follow?
If the allegations are proven, the accused could face charges related to forgery, defamation, and cybercrime under Indian law.
Q8. Is the investigation still ongoing?
Yes, police have confirmed that the investigation is ongoing, and further legal steps will depend on forensic analysis and questioning.