Donald Trump's Return to White House Could Signal Shift in Ukraine, Gaza Conflicts

Donald Trump’s Return to White House Could Signal Shift in Ukraine, Gaza Conflicts

Donald Trump's Return to White House Could Signal Shift in Ukraine, Gaza Conflicts

Washington, D.C. — Donald Trump’s re-election as President of the United States is poised to reshape the country’s foreign policy, with the new administration promising swift action on the ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza. Trump’s “America First” agenda could lead to an overhaul of traditional U.S. involvement in these international crises, with the President-elect pledging to bring both wars to a close.

Since his campaign began, Trump has stated he can end the Russia-Ukraine war within 24 hours, drawing on his reputation as a negotiator. Trump has repeatedly criticized the extensive U.S. financial and military support for Ukraine, suggesting that European nations should assume more responsibility for the conflict. His promise of a quick resolution, however, lacks specific details, sparking skepticism among analysts. “If we had a real president, a president that was respected by Putin…he would have never invaded Ukraine,” Trump remarked in a July campaign speech, highlighting his contention that respect, rather than deterrence, could alter Russia’s approach.

In the Middle East, Trump’s stance on Israel and the ongoing Gaza war reflects his previous administration’s strong pro-Israel stance, including his recognition of Israel’s sovereignty over the Golan Heights. The President-elect has also hinted at plans to encourage Israel to end the Gaza conflict before his inauguration on January 20. However, his approach raises questions, as several of his advisors support policies that align closely with Israeli settler interests. His son-in-law Jared Kushner, a prominent figure in Trump’s Middle East policy, has suggested controversial measures for Gaza, including relocating Palestinian civilians to the Negev desert.

Trump’s admiration for authoritarian leaders such as Viktor Orban and Vladimir Putin has fueled speculation about his approach to global diplomacy, as has his campaign rhetoric about minimizing U.S. intervention abroad. Some allies fear his approach may signal a diminished role for traditional diplomatic channels, including the United Nations and international law standards, particularly in conflicts where Trump sees room for rapid deals.

Despite the bold promises, it remains unclear if or how Trump’s administration would achieve these ambitious goals.