Pawan Singh Divorce Case: Bhojpuri film star Pawan Singh’s ongoing divorce case took an emotional turn at the Ara Civil Court’s Family Court when his wife, Jyoti Singh, made a heartfelt appeal during the proceedings. Through her lawyer, Vishnudhar Pandey, she told the court that she has spent seven years in marriage without receiving either emotional support or financial maintenance from her husband. Her statement has now brought renewed public attention to the high-profile dispute.

According to her counsel, Jyoti Singh clearly expressed her desire to continue the marriage. She stated that she wants to live with Pawan Singh and hopes that her pain will be acknowledged. However, she also placed a firm condition before the court: if her husband does not wish to stay with her, she should be granted ₹10 crore as maintenance. Her words reflected both emotional distress and financial insecurity, presenting the court with a complex marital dispute that goes beyond legal formalities.
The matter is currently under reconciliation proceedings, a mandatory step in family court cases where judges attempt to help couples resolve differences before finalizing a divorce. The purpose of this process is to explore the possibility of saving the marriage through dialogue and mutual understanding. Court sources indicate that both parties are being encouraged to settle their differences amicably before any final decision is taken.
Maintenance claims in such cases are typically assessed based on several factors, including the husband’s income, the couple’s lifestyle during marriage, the duration of the relationship, and the wife’s financial dependence. Given Pawan Singh’s stature in the Bhojpuri film industry, Jyoti Singh’s demand for ₹10 crore has sparked widespread discussion among fans and legal observers alike. However, the final amount, if any, will depend on judicial scrutiny and documented financial details.
Jyoti Singh’s claim that she did not receive love or financial support during the seven-year marriage has added an emotional dimension to the legal battle. While her side has openly shared her grievances in court, Pawan Singh has not publicly responded to these specific allegations during the ongoing reconciliation phase. The court will continue to examine the matter carefully before deciding the next course of action.
There are several possible outcomes in the case. The couple may reconcile and withdraw the divorce petition. They could also reach a mutual financial settlement outside prolonged litigation. If neither option works, the court may proceed with a contested divorce and determine maintenance based on legal parameters.
The case has drawn significant attention in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, where Pawan Singh commands a massive fan base. Many supporters believe personal disputes should remain private, while others are closely following every legal development. As the reconciliation process continues, the future of this marriage now rests in the hands of the court — and perhaps in the willingness of both parties to find common ground.
