Just six days before Punjab heads into Zila Parishad and Panchayat Samiti elections, the Punjab and Haryana High Court on Monday directed the State Election Commission (SEC) to spell out its stand on an ongoing inquiry into a viral conference-call audio clip that has triggered intense political debate across the state.
A Bench led by Chief Justice Sheel Nagu passed the directive while hearing petitions filed by former MLA Diljit Singh Cheema and other PIL petitioners, who claim the audio contains instructions that point toward systematic election interference.
Petitioners Allege Attempts to Influence Election Outcomes
According to the petitions, the alleged audio clip reveals instructions to:
- Stop opposition candidates either at their homes or en route
- Act on local MLAs’ directives during election processes
- Protect ruling AAP supporters by issuing favourable reports
- Ensure returning officers reject nominations, paving the way for uncontested victories
- Violate Model Code of Conduct (MCC) through coordinated efforts
The petitioners argue that the content of the clip, if genuine, exposes an attempt to manipulate the upcoming rural body elections.
SEC Says ADGP-Level Inquiry Is Underway
During the hearing, counsel for the Punjab State Election Commission informed the court that it had already entrusted an ADGP-level inquiry into the matter, led by ADGP SPS Parmar, and that the report is currently awaited.
Taking note of this submission, the Bench adjourned the matter until Wednesday, granting the SEC time to “come out with a clear stand” on the progress and outcome of the inquiry.
Debate Over Forensic Examination of the Audio
The issue of forensic verification also surfaced during the proceedings.
- Punjab government counsel argued that the original device containing the recording was necessary for accurate forensic analysis.
- PIL petitioners countered that the available audio material is sufficient for examination and insisted that the analysis should be done by a Chandigarh-based forensic laboratory, not one located in Punjab.
For now, the High Court has not issued any specific order regarding the forensic examination but has kept the matter pending.
What Happens Next
The court will resume the hearing the day after tomorrow, by which time the State Election Commission must present its stance on the inquiry and update the Bench on any findings or developments.
With rural body elections just days away, the matter has gained significant political and public attention, and the court’s upcoming directions are expected to play a crucial role in maintaining electoral transparency.